专利默示许可制度构建研究——以合同法与专利法的协调为视角 mobi 下载 网盘 caj lrf pdf txt 阿里云

本书主要包括如下几个方面：专利默示许可制度的发展史研究、专利默示许可制度理论基础的重构、专利默示许可的内涵、功能和类型分析、专利默示许可的适用条件和具体内容、专利默示许可在专利法和合同法上的协调、我国《专利法》上专利默示许可制度的规则设计。

绪论

一、研究背景与意义

二、 外研究述评

三、研究方法与思路

章 专利默示许可制度的历史基础0

节 专利默示许可的历史演进

一、19世纪中期至末期：与权利用尽同源孕育阶段

二、20世纪初至70年代末：走上***发展道路阶段

三、20世纪80年代以来：精准化与多元化发展阶段

第二节 专利默示许可的嬗变规律

一、适用条件：始终遵循合同关系的进路

二、价值目标：以利益平衡为基本价值取向

三、内容形式：个案确定与案例法本色

第三节 专利默示许可与专利权用尽的关系

一、专利默示许可与专利权用尽的联系

二、专利默示许可与专利权用尽的区别

本章小结

第二章 专利默示许可的理论基础0

节 普通法上专利默示许可的理论基础

一、有关专利默示许可的理论学说

二、专利默示许可理论学说的基本特征

第二节 大陆法上专利默示许可的理论基础

一、有关专利默示许可的理论学说

二、专利默示许可理论学说的基本特征

第三节 我国专利默示许可理论基础的重构

一、宏观层面：以诚实信用原则为价值

二、微观层面：以“两法”协同为操作指引

本章小结

第三章 专利默示许可的内涵、性质和分类

节 专利默示许可的内涵分析

一、是否需要专利权人行为的存在

二、使用人是否需要形成合理信赖

三、是否需要满足诚信原则的要求

第二节 专利默示许可的法律性质

一、专利默示许可是一种真正的合同关系

二、专利默示许可是一种不侵权抗辩事由

三、专利默示许可是一项专利权实施制度

第三节 专利默示许可的理论分类

一、依附基础合同关系的专利默示许可

二、构成***合同关系的专利默示许可

本章小结

第四章 专利默示许可的要件、内容和程序

节 专利默示许可的构成要件

一、存在直接互动关系

二、存在专利使用对价

三、符合诚信原则要求

第二节 专利默示许可的具体内容

一、专利默示许可的类型

二、专利默示许可的范围

三、专利默示许可的期限

四、专利默示许可的对价

第三节 专利默示许可的认定程序

一、专利默示许可的认定是一个法律问题

二、专利默示许可是一种无须主张的抗辩

三、专利默示许可判定中举证责任的分配

本章小结

第五章 专利默示许可制度构建的中国方案

节 我国专利默示许可的司法实践

一、司法实践开展情况

二、司法成就与不足

第二节 我国专利默示许可的立法活动

一、立法活动开展情况

二、立法活动的不足

第三节 我国专利默示许可制度的构建

一、制度建构的考量因素

二、愿景制度的运行架构

本章小结

余 论

一、专用品销售的默示许可

二、标准化专利的默示许可

三、合同法与专利法的协调

参考文献

杨德桥，内蒙古科技大学文法学院教授、硕士生导师，文法学院教授委员会委员、法律硕士教育中心主任，中国政法大学法学博士、 法学研究所博士后。 主要从事知识产权法、合同法教学和研究。出版学术专著3部，发表学术论文30余篇；主持 人文社会科学研究项目1项、中国博士后科学基金项目1项、内蒙古哲学社会科学规划项目2项；获得内蒙古自治区第七届哲学社会科学 成果政府奖一等奖1项、包头市哲学社会科学 成果政府奖二等奖3项、中国政法大学博士研究生 奖学金1项、 法学研究所 博士后出站报告。兼任内蒙古法学会知识产权法学研究会副会长、***包头市委法律顾问、包头市仲裁委员会仲裁员、上海市建纬（包头）律师事务所***律师。

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：专利默示许可制度构建研究——以合同法与专利法的协调为视角在线阅读

在线听书地址：专利默示许可制度构建研究——以合同法与专利法的协调为视角在线收听

在线购买地址：专利默示许可制度构建研究——以合同法与专利法的协调为视角在线购买

There is one further point to be made about awards of expectation damages. An award of such damages in either of the two situati*** envisaged above was, in a sense, a reward for diligence, skill, and foresight. The man who managed to buy at less than market price, the man who had the foresight to buy in advance of changes in market price, was a man who outsmarted his contracting partner. It was precisely this sort of diligence, skill, and foresight which, it was coming to be felt, ought to be rewarded and encouraged. In the next century, this indeed became the dominant philosophy of the age. But in the eighteenth century (as, perhaps, today) there were many who viewed these qualities with some distaste rather than with admiration. To make a contract to buy at less than the market price was...

Predictability of the law Mansfield also encouraged by his attempts to incorporate large areas of commercial practice into the law. *** Mansfield was not greatly enamoured of the ordinary jury (as we know from his attempts to keep general verdicts out of their hands in seditious libel cases) and in commercial cases he was convinced that the unpredictability of a jury’s decision was a major source of dissatisfaction to businessmen. It is true that Mansfield is famous for the use he made of special juries drawn from the City, but this was merely an intelligent process designed to pave the way for the ultimate withering away of the jury function in commercial cases. *** We have seen how, in Mansfield’s time, Parliament and Government had neither the staff nor the expertise to carry through in...

The various ways in which the lawyers found it possible to evade the usury laws are described in standard works, and it is unnecessary to go into them in detail. It is sufficient to make one point. All the accepted methods of borrowing money at rates above the permitted maximum depended ultimately on the concept of risk. If the lende***as certain to get his money back, and was certain to get, in addition, a return above the permitted maximum, then the transaction was usurious and illegal, no matter how it might be devised. Of course nobody is ever certain to get even his capital back, because debtors may default; but this risk was ignored by the law (hence its fundamental unreality, of course) and so it was always necessary to build in additional risks. One of the most common procedures, i...

I must now return to the point made above about the importance of the long-term effects of judicial decisi***. It is scarcely possible to exaggerate the difference of attitude on this point between that of a judge of the mid-nineteenth century, and that of the judge of today. The judge of 1850 was much more concerned, even in civil law, with the influence of his decision on the behaviour of people in the future. *** Principles were what mattered; if the right principles were selected, they had to be applied in the belief that their general tendency would be to produce justice overall, even though in the case in hand, the result might seem harsh. Legal decisi*** could not be looked at in isolation to determine the fairest or most just solution in the particular circumstances; every decision...

暂无其它内容！