Ronald Dworkin罗纳德·德沃金 mobi 下载 网盘 caj lrf pdf txt 阿里云

Ronald Dworkin occupies a distinctive place in both public life and philosophy. In public life, he is a regular contributor to The New York Review of Books and othe***idely read journals. In philosophy, he has written important and influential works on many of the most prominent issues in legal and political philosophy. In both cases, his interventi*** have in part shaped the debates he joined. His opposition to Robert Bork's nomination for the United States Supreme Court gave new centrality to debates about the public role of judges and the role of original intent in c***titutional interpretation. His writings in legal philosophy have reoriented the modern debate about legal positivism and natural law. In political philosophy, he has shaped the ways in which people debate the nature of equality and has reframed debates about the sanctity of life.

Contributors page

Introduction: Anti-Archimedeanism

ARTHUR RIPSTEIN

1 The “Hart–Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed

2 The Rule of Law as the Rule of Liberal Principle

3 Liberty and Equality

4 Rights, Resp***ibilities, and Reflecti*** on the Sanctity of Life

5 Hercules, Abraham Lincoln, the United States C***titution, and the Problem of Slavery

Bibliography

Index

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Ronald Dworkin罗纳德·德沃金在线阅读

在线听书地址：Ronald Dworkin罗纳德·德沃金在线收听

在线购买地址：Ronald Dworkin罗纳德·德沃金在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

作者介绍：Arthur Ripstein

Arthur Ripstein is professor of law and philosophy at the University of Toronto. An associate editor of Philosophy & Public Affairs, he is the author of Equality, Resp***ibility and the Law and Practical Rationality and Preference.

书籍介绍

Ronald Dworkin occupies a distinctive place in both public life and philosophy. In public life, he is a regular contributor to The New York Review of Books and othe***idely read journals. In philosophy, he has written important and influential works on many of the most prominent issues in legal and political philosophy. In both cases, his interventi*** have in part shaped the debates he joined. His opposition to Robert Bork's nomination for the United States Supreme Court gave new centrality to debates about the public role of judges and the role of original intent in c***titutional interpretation. His writings in legal philosophy have reoriented the modern debate about legal positivism and natural law. In political philosophy, he has shaped the ways in which people debate the nature of equality and has reframed debates about the sanctity of life.