The language of liberal c***titutionalism自由主义宪政原则语言 mobi 下载 网盘 caj lrf pdf txt 阿里云

This book explores two basic questi*** regarding c***titutional theory. Firstly, how is the creation of a legitimate c***titutional regime possible? Second, what must be true about a c***titution if the regime that it ***s is to retain its claim to legitimacy?

Introduction

1 The Search for Sovereignty: Law, Language, and the Beginnings of Modern C***titutionalism

2 C***ent How? Challenges to Lockean C***titutionalism

3 C***titutional Language and the Possibility of Binding Commitments

4 C***ent to What? Exclusivity and Completeness in C***titutional and Legal Language

5 The Question of Substance: Morality, Law, and C***titutional Legitimacy

6 The Defense of C***titutional Language

Bibliography

Index

Howard Schweber is associate professor of political science at the University of Wisc***in，Madison. He is the author of The Creation of American Common Law，1850-1880 and Speech，Conduct，and the First Amendment，as well as book chapters and articles in

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：The language of liberal c***titutionalism自由主义宪政原则语言在线阅读

在线听书地址：The language of liberal c***titutionalism自由主义宪政原则语言在线收听

在线购买地址：The language of liberal c***titutionalism自由主义宪政原则语言在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

This book explores two basic questi*** regarding c***titutional theory. First, in view of a commitment to democratic self-rule and widespread disagreement on questi*** of value, how is the creation of a legitimate c***titutional regime possible? Second, what must be true about a c***titution if the regime that it ***s is to retain its claim to legitimacy? Howard Schweber shows that the answers to these questi*** appear in a theory of c***titutional language that combines democratic theory with c***titutional philosophy. The creation of a legitimate c***titutional regime depends on a shared commitment to a particular and specialized form of language. Out of this *** observation, Schweber develops arguments about the characteristics of c***titutional language, the necessary differences between c***titutional language and the language of ordinary law or morality, as well as the authority of officials such as judges to engage in c***titutional review of laws.