The City and the Court 1603-1643(I***N=9780521071376) mobi 下载 网盘 caj lrf pdf txt 阿里云

　　The fact that London was parliamentarian rather than royalist

was one of the principal reas*** for the defeat of Charles I in the

English Civil War. This book reinterprets London's role. It

examines the relation of the municipality and of the City fathers

as business magnates with both of the early Stuart kings and their

parliaments, and explores the business connecti*** of the City with

the royal court, concluding that, far from being the natural allies

of the king and court as is generally assumed, the City elite had

mostly been seriously alienated from them by 1640. Professor Ashton

offers an interpretation not only of the City's role in the years

before 1640 but also of the reas*** lying behind its *** for

parliament in 1642. It is both a contribution to the debate on the

origins of the Civil War and a study in depth of the connection

between big business and politics in early Stuart England.

Introduction

1. Instituti*** and oligarchy I: the municipal and business

elites

2. Instituti*** and oligarchy II: gilds and companies

3. Big business and politics under James I

4. Big business and politics under Charles I

5. The crown and the municipality: local issues

6. The municipality and national issues

7. Conclusion

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：The City and the Court 1603-1643(I***N=9780521071376)在线阅读

在线听书地址：The City and the Court 1603-1643(I***N=9780521071376)在线收听

在线购买地址：The City and the Court 1603-1643(I***N=9780521071376)在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

The fact that London was parliamentarian rather than royalist was one of the principal reas*** for the defeat of Charles I in the English Civil War. This book reinterprets London's role. It examines the relation of the municipality and of the City fathers as business magnates with both of the early Stuart kings and their parliaments, and explores the business connecti*** of the City with the royal court, concluding that, far from being the natural allies of the king and court as is generally assumed, the City elite had mostly been seriously alienated from them by 1640. Professor Ashton offers an interpretation not only of the City's role in the years before 1640 but also of the reas*** lying behind its *** for parliament in 1642. It is both a contribution to the debate on the origins of the Civil War and a study in depth of the connection between big business and politics in early Stuart England.